<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LePatner&#8217;s Book Hit&#8217;s the Nail on the Head</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geedra.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geedra.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/</link>
	<description>Discussion and Opinion on the Re-Invention of Construction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:32:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asymmetric Information and Renovating your Kitchen &#171; Changing Construction</title>
		<link>http://blog.geedra.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Asymmetric Information and Renovating your Kitchen &#171; Changing Construction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 19:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changingconstruction.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>[...]  In Barry LePatner&#8217;s book Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets (originally discussed here) he sites asymmetric information as one of the key contributors to the problems of the construction [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  In Barry LePatner&#8217;s book Broken Buildings, Busted Budgets (originally discussed here) he sites asymmetric information as one of the key contributors to the problems of the construction [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.geedra.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changingconstruction.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/lepatners-book-hits-the-nail-on-the-head/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>LePatner makes a good case for fundamental change in an industry that each year gets less efficient and workers are less productive.

I have been involved in several high-rise luxury condominium projects - I estimate the waste at 30-50%.  We employed a few consultants who approached the jobs to &quot;cut construction costs.&quot;  That IS the problem.  It isn&#039;t a matter of cutting costs, it&#039;s about reinventing the whole construction process.  

There is a deal simmering in Dallas where a notable architect and a large GC claim to be able to cut the build schedule in half - 14 months, instead of 28 for a 35 story building.  They weren&#039;t looking to cut costs, they were looking to speed the delivery.  It looks promising.  They also believe the costs will be 20-30% less.  I&#039;ve only had one conversation with them at an AutoDesk Revit Users meeting and they presented it as a design-build system and a whole new way to complete buildings.  They were also working on patents for there innovations.  I&#039;ll keep an eye on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LePatner makes a good case for fundamental change in an industry that each year gets less efficient and workers are less productive.</p>
<p>I have been involved in several high-rise luxury condominium projects &#8211; I estimate the waste at 30-50%.  We employed a few consultants who approached the jobs to &#8220;cut construction costs.&#8221;  That IS the problem.  It isn&#8217;t a matter of cutting costs, it&#8217;s about reinventing the whole construction process.  </p>
<p>There is a deal simmering in Dallas where a notable architect and a large GC claim to be able to cut the build schedule in half &#8211; 14 months, instead of 28 for a 35 story building.  They weren&#8217;t looking to cut costs, they were looking to speed the delivery.  It looks promising.  They also believe the costs will be 20-30% less.  I&#8217;ve only had one conversation with them at an AutoDesk Revit Users meeting and they presented it as a design-build system and a whole new way to complete buildings.  They were also working on patents for there innovations.  I&#8217;ll keep an eye on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
